James Farmer


September 11 - 20 Years On

Thursday, September 09, 2021

Like such landmark events as the first landing on the Moon, the killing of President Kennedy and the death of Princess Diana (on my birthday actually), we all remember where we were at the time. In the case of the terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers in New York and the Penatagon in Washington on September 11, 2001, I was participating in putting Ansett Australia into voluntary administration. Ansett was at that time a fully-owned subsidiary of Air New Zealand and I was Acting Chair of the latter. More could be said about that and the sequel which ultimately led to the New Zealand Government taking a majority shareholding in Air New Zealand but I want here to talk more about the sequel to the terrorist attacks in the United States and its relevance to New Zealand today.

There were 19 al Qaeda terrorists, based in the US at the time. As is well known, the attack was master-minded by Osama bin Laden, a native of Saudi Arabia.

What is lesser known in this country is that in 2003 various lawsuits (since consolidated) were issued in New York against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on behalf of the families of the 3000 victims of the attacks, injured survivors and insurers who have paid out billions of dollars in compensation for property damage. The claims made in the litigation allege that agents, officials and employees of the Saudi Government provided assistance to the hijackers and plotters. It is alleged also that al Qaeda’s development into a sophisticated terrorist organization was driven principally by financial and operational support from “da’wa organisations” (said to be charities) established and sponsored by the Saudi Government. An attempt by that Government to strike out the court proceedings failed.

To facilitate the hearing of the proceedings on its merits, on 27 September 2016 the US Congress enacted the Justice against Sponsors of Terrorism Act which, in the case of foreign States designated as sponsors of terrorism, removed the defence of sovereign immunity normally accorded to foreign States in accordance with principles of international law. That enactment has allowed the litigation to proceed. The current position that has been reached is that former Saudi officials have been deposed under oath, although the depositions and certain Government documents presently remain under seal.

How does this concern New Zealand?

Followers of the America’s Cup will know the answer immediately. Jeddah, in Saudi Arabia, is on Team New Zealand’s short list for the hosting rights of the next Defence by the Royal New Zealand Yacht Squadron of the Cup as well as sponsorship of Team New Zealand’s campaign. Note the words “Royal New Zealand” and note too the words “New Zealand” in Team New Zealand.

Elsewhere many have expressed dismay at the abrogation by Team New Zealand of its moral obligations to the New Zealand Government, the people of New Zealand and the Auckland Council in its moves to take the Defence away from New Zealand. I have written on the same subject in this column, first in December 2017 when it was first mooted after the Cup was won in Bermuda and then again more recently.

When the last Defence was held here earlier this year, it was (rightly) said by Team New Zealand: “The AC75s and the unprecedented broadcast reach of the exciting racing from Auckland’s stunning Waitemata harbour have really put Auckland and the America’s Cup at the forefront of international sport”.

If the next Defence is conducted in Saudi, what will the Team New Zealand PR department write then?

Jeddah is widely regarded as being the likely winner of the “hosting fee” contest. To begin with, it is unlikely to have internal critics of funding the Event that exist in the other two foreign cities on Team New Zealand’s short list (Cork and Valencia). And Saudi Arabia has shown that it is willing to throw money around to seek to buy respectability in international sport. The Guardian on 28 March 2021 reported that Saudi had “spent at least $1.5bn on high-profile international sporting events in a bid to bolster it reputation”, what was described as “’sportswashing’, the practice of investing or hosting sporting events in a bid to obscure the Kingdom’s poor human rights record, and tout itself as a new global venue for tourism and events”. The Guardian had reported earlier (on 2 September 2019) on the establishment of a Saudi Sports Development Fund which has successfully bought and brought to Saudi motor sport (including Formula 1 later this year), boxing, wrestling, basketball, football and golf. The Guardian described these Government-backed endeavours as “a soft power tactic to help distract from the kingdom’s ongoing human rights abuses”.

The Guardian, in both articles, referred specifically to the Saudi intervention in Yemen, part of a war that has killed over 100,000 people including 12,000 citizens and left 14 million people at risk of starvation. Further, a recent US Intelligence report named Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as ultimately responsible for the murder and dismembering in the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018, followed by a death threat by a senior Saudi official against a United Nations Investigator, Agnes Callamard, who was investigating that murder.

So here is the question.

It is clear that Team New Zealand, or rather those that control it, do not recognise a moral obligation to the country whose name they have appropriated so far as the venue for the next Defence of the America’s Cup is concerned. But, arguably even more importantly, will it recognise an obligation to the international reputation of this country? Or does Team New Zealand simply believe “we won the Cup, therefore we own it, it is ours to sell to the highest bidder and if that means aligning New Zealand to a country that more than any other has fostered terrorist activity, that’s not our problem”.

Jim Farmer

9 September 2021

Recent Posts

  1. Directors’ Duties to Creditors in an Insolvency Situation 22-Sep-2023
  2. Redundancy, Good faith and Employment Law 18-Aug-2023
  3. Is the America's Cup a poisoned chalice for New Zealand? 09-May-2023
  4. The Passing of Two Knights of the Realm - Sir Murray Halberg and Sir Ian Barker 07-Dec-2022
  5. Random Legal Thoughts While on a Post-Covid Lockdown European Trip 31-Oct-2022
  6. America's Cup Venue - Fact or Fiction Chris Goode 04-Apr-2022
  7. Covid and the New Zealand Rules Committee Proposed Reforms Chris Goode 24-Jan-2022
  8. A Chat On The Virtual Couch About My Legal Career Chris Goode 26-Nov-2021
  9. America’s Cup Home Defence – Requisition For Special General Meeting Of Members Of Royal New Zealand Yacht Squadron To Discuss Venue For Next Defence Chris Goode 24-Nov-2021
  10. Pandemics 12-Nov-2021
  11. America's Cup - Just Do It and Positivity 20-Sep-2021
  12. September 11 - 20 Years On 09-Sep-2021
  13. Whither America's Cup? Chris Goode 22-Jun-2021
  14. Conducting Civil Appeals Chris Goode 07-Mar-2021
  15. David Barnes (27 April 1958 - 23 October 2020) - A Personal Note Chris Goode 02-Nov-2020
  16. Cannabis Bill Not the Right Reform Chris Goode 07-Oct-2020
  17. Whatever the result, is this the last time the America's Cup event is held in New Zealand? Chris Goode 14-Sep-2020
  18. Cannabis Legal Reform - Arguments For and Against Chris Goode 13-Aug-2020
  19. Will the Proposed Cannabis Legislation Achieve its "Overarching Objective" of Reducing the Harms Associated with Cannabis Use? Chris Goode 18-May-2020
  20. The Debate Continues - Virtual Hearings or Real Hearings Chris Goode 02-May-2020
  21. These Issues were all Predicted Pre-Covid-19 and 6 Years Ago Chris Goode 02-May-2020
  22. And here is a Report from Stuff of a Virtual Hearing this Week Chris Goode 30-Apr-2020
  23. More Correspondence on Covid-19 and the Courts Chris Goode 30-Apr-2020
  24. In Defence of Remote Technology - from Steve Keall Chris Goode 29-Apr-2020
  25. Court Hearings and Covid-19 - Part Two Chris Goode 29-Apr-2020
  26. Court Hearings and Covid-19 Chris Goode 28-Apr-2020
  27. Covid-19 and Executory Contracts: Will the Doctrine of Frustration Apply? Chris Goode 06-Apr-2020
  28. Race, Poverty and Education - Lessons from the UK learned while spending Christmas in London December 2019 Chris Goode 13-Jan-2020
  29. Witnesses in Civil Cases - the Consequences of Not Calling and of Not Cross-Examining - A Paper Presented to the Pacific Islands Lawyers Association, Auckland, 22 November 2019 Chris Goode 21-Nov-2019
  30. The Forthcoming Referendum on the Growing and Supply of Cannabis for Personal Recreational Use Chris Goode 19-Nov-2018
  31. Armistice Day and Its Sequel Chris Goode 13-Nov-2018
  32. An Easy Read of the Rule of Law in the World of Fiction Chris Goode 08-Aug-2018
  33. Bullying, Harassment and Gender Bias Chris Goode 22-May-2018
  34. Criticising Judges Chris Goode 07-May-2018
  35. America's Cup Part 3A Chris Goode 11-Dec-2017
  36. America's Cup Part 3 Chris Goode 04-Dec-2017
  37. Pro Bono Publico as an Aid to Living a Balanced Lifestyle Chris Goode 08-Nov-2017
  38. Terence Arnold Retires From the Supreme Court Bench Chris Goode 10-Apr-2017
  39. From Violence to Redemption Chris Goode 14-Mar-2017
  40. Drugs, Sports and Society Chris Goode 18-Oct-2016
  41. Are Our Law Schools Churning Out Too Many Lawyers? Chris Goode 25-Aug-2016
  42. Equiticorp 20 Years On Chris Goode 07-Jun-2016
  43. The Year in Retrospect Chris Goode 19-Jan-2016
  44. A Good Year for the Farmer Legal Family Chris Goode 30-Oct-2015
  45. Having a Balanced Life Style - Part 4 Chris Goode 21-Sep-2015
  46. A Balanced Life Style (Part 3), Prisoners' Voting Rights, Top Gun, 7000kms in a Corvette, John Maynard Keynes and Atticus Finch Chris Goode 05-Aug-2015
  47. Biographies Chris Goode 13-Apr-2015
  48. The Cost of Justice Chris Goode 13-Mar-2015
  49. The Increase in Unrepresented Litigants and Their Effect on the Judicial Process Chris Goode 11-Feb-2015
  50. Evidence - Notes of Presentation to Continuing Legal Education Seminar November 2014 Chris Goode 01-Dec-2014
  51. Corporate Governance and Directors' Liability Chris Goode 19-Aug-2014
  52. Paper Presented on 2 August 2014 at the Competition Law & Policy Institute of New Zealand 25th Annual Conference Chris Goode 05-Aug-2014
  53. Life in the Fast Lane Chris Goode 06-Jun-2014
  54. 2014 - Roaring Past Chris Goode 04-Jun-2014
  55. Commentary on Paper Delivered by Professor Andrew I Gavil at Commerce Commission Conference Chris Goode 18-Nov-2013
  56. America's Cup Wrap Up Chris Goode 04-Oct-2013
  57. Happiness, Living a Balanced Life and Legal Practice - Part II Chris Goode 15-Aug-2013
  58. America's Cup 2013 Chris Goode 01-Jul-2013
  59. Why the Rules of Evidence Matter in Civil Cases Chris Goode 11-Mar-2013
  60. The High Court in Review Chris Goode 07-Oct-2012
  61. "Criticism of Supreme Court needs to be put in context" as published in the New Zealand Herald 11 May 2012 Chris Goode 23-May-2012
  62. Recent Reform Reports Chris Goode 03-Apr-2012
  63. Happiness, Living a Balanced Life and Legal Practice Chris Goode 09-Jan-2012
  64. In Defence of the Supreme Court Chris Goode 12-Dec-2011
  66. Cross Examination Notes Chris Goode 11-Nov-2011
  67. Are the independence of the Judiciary and the Rule of Law under threat? Chris Goode 16-Oct-2011
  68. Commentary on my commentary on Morse Chris Goode 14-Sep-2011
  69. The passing of three leaders of the Bar Chris Goode 14-Sep-2011
  70. How good is our Supreme Court? Chris Goode 08-Aug-2011

Georgia Racing

Website Managed by Generate Design